E-Learning
Theorien, Gestaltungsempfehlungen und Forschung
  • Einleitung
  • Theorien
  • Gestaltung
  • Forschung
  • Ausblick

      Literaturverzeichnis

      A

      • Ahmad, A.-R., Basir, O. und Hassanein, K. (2004). Adaptive user interfaces for intelligent E-Learning: Issues and trends. In J. Chen (Hrsg.), The Fourth International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB2004) (S. 925-934). Beijing, China: Academic Publishers/World Publishing Corporation.
      • Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33, 131-152.
      • Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183-198.
      • Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P. A. und Wood, D. (2002). Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primacy mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 25-61.
      • Ainsworth, S. und van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14, 241-255.
      • Aldrich, F. K. und Parkin, A. J. (1988). Improving the retention of aurally presented information. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris und R. N. Sykes (Hrsg.), Practical aspects of memory (S. 490-493). Chichester, England: Wiley.
      • Amadieu, F., Tricot, A. und Mariné, C. (2009). Prior knowledge in learning from a non-linear electronic document: Disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 381-388.
      • Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R. und Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive Tutors: Lesson learned. The Journal of the Learning Science, 4, 167-207.
      • Anderson, J. R. und Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Ang, C. S., Avni, E. und Zaphiris, P. (2008). Linking pedagogical theory of computer games to their usability. International Journal on E-Learning, 7, 533-558.
      • Antonietti, A. und Giorgetti, M. (2006). Teachers' beliefs about learning from multimedia. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 267-282.
      • Anzai, Y. (1991). Learning and use of representations for physics expertise. In K. Anders-Ericsson und J. Smith (Hrsg.), Towards a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
      • APA. (2002). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. [Internet/WWW]. Verfügbar unter: www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html [5. Juni 2009].
      • Arguel, A. und Jamet, E. (2009). Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 354-359.
      • Arnold, P. (2004). Einsatz digitaler Medien in der Hochschullehre aus lerntheoretischer Sicht. [Internet/WWW]. Verfügbar unter: http://www.e-teaching.org/didaktik/theorie/lerntheorie/arnold.pdf [30. Juli 2009].
      • Asendorpf, J. B. (2007). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit (3. Auflage). Berlin: Springer.
      • Atkinson, C. und Shiffrin, R. M. (1971). The control of short-term memory. Scientific American, 225, 82-90.
      • Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A. und Wortham, D. W. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181-214.
      • Atkinson, R. K., Mayer, R. E. und Merrill, M. M. (2005). Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent's voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 117-139.
      • Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
      • Ayres, P. (1993). Why goal-free problems can facilitate learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 376-381.
      • Ayres, P. (2006). Impact of Reducing Intrinsic Cognitive Load on Learning in a Mathematical Domain. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 287-298.
      • Ayres, P., Marcus, N., Chan, C. und Qian, N. (2009). Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 348-353.
      • Ayres, P. und Paas, F. (2009). Interdisciplinary perspectives inspiring a new generation of cognitive load research. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 1-9.
      • Ayres, P. und Sweller, J. (1990). Locus of difficulty in multi-stage mathematics problems. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 167-193.
      • Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C. und Greene, J. A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33, 381-412.
      • Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I. und Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45-72.

      B

      • Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
      • Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 417-423.
      • Baddeley, A. D. (2002). Is working memory still working? European Psychologist, 7, 85-97.
      • Baddeley, A. D. und Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Hrsg.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Bd. 8, S. 47-89). New York: Academic press.
      • Baecker, R. M., Grudin, J., Buxton, W. und Greenberg, S. (1995). Human-Computer Interaction: Toward the year 2000. In R. M. Baecker (Hrsg.), Groupware and computer-supported cooperative work (S. 741-753). San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
      • Baggett, P. (1989). Understanding visual and verbal messages. In H. Mandl und J. R. Levin (Hrsg.), Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (S. 101-124). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
      • Baggett, P. und Ehrenfeucht, A. (1983). Encoding and retaining information in the visuals and verbals of an educational movie. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 31, 23-32.
      • Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 359-375.
      • Barlett, C. P., Vowels, C. L., Shanteau, J., Crow, J. und Miller, T. (2009). The effect of violent and non-violent computer games on cognitive performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 96-102.
      • Baron, R. M. und Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1173-1182.
      • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
      • Batinic, B. (2004). Online-Research. In R. Mangold, P. Vorderer und G. Bente (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Medienpsychologie (S. 251-270). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
      • Beagles-Roos, J. und Gat, I. (1983). Specific impact of radio and television on children's story comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 128-137.
      • Beller, S. (2008). Empirisch forschen lernen: Konzepte, Methoden, Fallbeispiele, Tipps (2. Auflage). Bern: Huber.
      • Bem, D. J. (2003). Writing the empirical journal article. In J. M. Darley, M. P. Zannam und H. L. Roedinger III (Hrsg.), The Compleat Academic: A Career Guide (S. 185-219). Washington, DC: Cambridge University Press.
      • Bente, G. (2004). Erfassung und Analyse des Blickverhaltens. In R. Mangold, P. Vorderer und G. Bente (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Medienpsychologie (S. 297-324). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
      • Bereiter, C. und Scardamalia, M. (1985). Cognitive coping strategies and the problem of "inert knowlege". In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal und R. Glaser (Hrsg.), Thinking and learning skills: Current research and open questions (Bd. 2, S. 65-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Berekoven, L., Eckert, W. und Ellenrieder, P. (1999). Marktforschung: Methodische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung (8. Auflage). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
      • Berry, D. C. und Broadbent, D. E. (1987). Explanation and verbalization in a computer-assisted search task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 585-609.
      • Berthold, K. und Renkl, A. (2009). Instructional aids to support a conceptual understanding of multiple representations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 70-87.
      • Bétrancourt, M. (2005). The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 287-296). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Bhattachary, M. (1999). A study of asynchronous and synchronous discussion on cognitive maps in a distributed learning environment. In P. M. E. De Bra und J. J. Legget (Hrsg.), WebNet Conference on the WWW and Internet (S. 100-105). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
      • Bibby, P. A. und Payne, S. J. (1993). Internalization and the use specificity of device knowledge. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 25-56.
      • Birg, G. (1978). Subjective aspects of physical work. Ergonomics, 21, 215-220.
      • Blackmore, S. (2006). Conversations on Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.
      • Blake, T. (1977). Motion in instructional media: Some subject-display mode interactions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 975-985.
      • Bloom, B. S. und Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans Green.
      • Bloom, B. S., Madaus, G. F. und Hastings, J. T. (1981). Evaluation to improve learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
      • Blumberg, F. C., Rosenthal, S. F. und Randall, J. D. (2008). Impasse-driven learning in the context of video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1530-1541.
      • Bobis, J., Sweller, J. und Cooper, M. (1993). The redundancy effect in an elementary school geometry task. Learning and Instruction, 3, 1-21.
      • Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Feuerlein, I. und Spada, H. (2004). The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualisations. Learning and Instruction, 14, 325-341.
      • Bonett, D. G. (1982). On post-hoc blocking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 35-39.
      • Borba, M. C. (1994, July/August). A model for student's understanding in a multi-representational software environment. Vortrag vorgestellt auf der 18th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Lissabon.
      • Bortz, J. (2005). Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (6. Auflage). Berlin: Springer.
      • Bortz, J. und Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (4th). Berlin: Springer.
      • Boucheix, J.-M. und Schneider, E. (2009). Static and animated presentations in learning dynamic mechanical systems. Learning and Instruction, 19, 112-127.
      • Boytcheva, S. und Kovatcheva, E. (2006). Development of adaptive E-Learning system based on learning objects. Communication and Cognition, 39, 41-50.
      • Bransford, J. D. (1978). Human cognition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
      • Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Vye, N. J. und Sherwood, R. D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can't be told. In S. Vosniadou und A. Ortony (Hrsg.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (S. 470-497). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
      • Bratfisch, O., Borg, G. und Dornic, S. (1972). Perceived item-difficulty in three tests of intellectual performance capacity (Rep. No. 29). Stockholm: Institute of Applied Psychology.
      • Brna, P. (1996, Januar). Can't see the words for the tree: Interpretation and graphical representation. Vortrag vorgestellt auf der I. E. E. Colloquium on thinking with diagrams, London.
      • Brody, P. J. (1981). Research on pictures in instructional texts: The need for a broadened perspective. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 93-100.
      • Brown, A. L. (1989). Analogical learning and transfer: What develops? In S. Vosniadou und A. Ortony (Hrsg.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (S. 470-497). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
      • Brown, R. I. F. (1991). Gaming, gambling and other addictive play. In J. H. Kerr und M. J. Apter (Hrsg.), Adult play: A reversal theory approach (S. 101-118). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
      • Brown, R. I. F. (1993). Some contributions of the study of gambling to the study of other addictions. In W. R. Eadington und J. A. Cornelius (Hrsg.), Gambling behavior and problem gambling (S. 241-272). Reno, NV: University of Nevada.
      • Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32.
      • Brünken, R. und Leutner, D. (2001). Aufmerksamkeitsverteilung oder Aufmerksamkeitsfokussierung? Empirische Ergebnisse zur “Split-Attention-Hypothese” beim Lernen mit Multimedia. [Split of attention or focusing of attention? Empirical results on the splitattention-hypothesis in multimedia learning]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 29, 357–366.
      • Brünken, R., Plass, J. L. und Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 53-61.
      • Brünken, R., Plass, J. L. und Leutner, D. (2004). Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual-task methodology: Auditory load and modality effects. Instructional Science, 32, 115-132.
      • Brusilovsky, P. (2003). Adaptive navigation support in educational hypermedia: the role of student knowledge level and the case for meta-adaptation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 487-497.
      • Brusilovsky, P., Chavan, G. und Farzan, R. (2004). Social adaptive navigation support for open corpus electronic textbooks. In P. M. E. De Bra und W. Nejdl (Hrsg.), Proceedings of Third International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (AH'2004) (S. 24-33). Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Springer.
      • Bühl, A. (2008). SPSS Version 16: Einführung in die moderne Datenanalyse (11. Auflage). München: Pearson Studium.
      • Burgos, D., Tattersall, C. und Koper, E. J. R. (2006). Representing adaptive eLearning strategies in IMS Learning Design. In R. Koper und K. Stefanov (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the International Workshop in Learning Networks for Lifelong Competence Development (S. 54-60). Sofia, Bulgaria: TENCompetence Conference.
      • Burns, B. und Vollmeyer, R. (2002). Goal specificity effects on hypothesis testing in problem solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 55, 241-261.
      • Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 182-197.
      • Byrne, M. D., Catrambone, R. und Stasko, J. T. (1999). Evaluating animations as student aids in learning computer algorithms. Computers and Education, 33, 253-278.

      C

      • Calisir, F., Eryazici, M. und Lehto, M. R. (2008). The effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on computer-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 439-450.
      • Camacho, D., Ortigosa, Á., Pulido, E. und R-Moreno, M. D. (2008). AI techniques for monitoring student learning process. In F. J. García Penalvo (Hrsg.), Advances in E-Learning: Experiences and Methodologies (S. 149-172). Hershey, USA: Information Science Reference.
      • Camp, G., Paas, F., Rikers, R. und Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2001). Dynamic problem selection in air traffic control training: A comparison between performance, mental effort and mental efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 575-595.
      • Carney, R. N. und Levin, J. R. (2002). Picturial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5-26.
      • Carroll, W. (1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 360-367.
      • Casali, J. G. und Wierwille, W. W. (1984). On the measurement of pilot perceptual workload: A comparison of assessment techniques addressing sensitivity and intrusion issues. Ergonomics, 27, 1033-1050.
      • Chambliss, M. J. (2002). The characteristics of well-designed science textbooks. In J. Otero, J. A. León und A. C. Graesser (Hrsg.), The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension (S. 51-72). Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
      • Chandler, P. und Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
      • Chandler, P. und Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 233-246.
      • Chandler, P. und Sweller, J. (1996). Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 151-170.
      • ChanLin, L.-J. (2000). Attributes of animation for learning scientific knowledge. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27, 228-238.
      • Charlton, J. P. und Danforth, I. D. W. (2007). Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1531-1548.
      • Chase, W. G. und Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
      • Chen, C.-M., Lee, H.-M. und Chen, Y.-H. (2005). Personalized e-Learning system using Item Response Theory. Computers and Education, 44, 237-255.
      • Chen, S. Y., Fan, J.-P. und Macredie, R. D. (2006). Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: Experts vs. novices. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 251-266.
      • Chen, X. und Anderson, R. C. (2008). Reflections on becoming a successful researcher. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 65-70.
      • Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J. und Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
      • Ciavarro, C., Dobson, M. und Goodman, D. (2008). Implicit learning as a design strategy for learning games: Alert Hockey. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2862-2872.
      • Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K. und Gerjets, P. (2009). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 315-324.
      • Clark, J. M. und Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-210.
      • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445-459.
      • Clark, R. E. (1985). Evidence for confounding in computer-based instruction studies: Analyzing the meta analyses. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 33, 249-262.
      • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 21-29.
      • Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. and Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
      • Cohen, A. C. (2005). The influence of spatial ability on the use of dynamic, interactive animation in a spatial problem-solving task. In T. Barkowsky, C. Freksa, M. Hegarty und R. K. Lowe (Hrsg.), Reasoning with mental and external diagrams: Computational modelling and spatial assistance (S. 1-5). Standford, CA: Standford University.
      • Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249-253.
      • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. Auflage). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Conlan, O., Dagger, D. und Wade, V. (2002). Towards a standards-based approach to e-Learning personalization using reusable learning objects. In G. Richards (Hrsg.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2002 (S. 210-217). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
      • Conlan, O., Hockemeyer, C., Wade, V. und Albert, D. (2002). Metadata driven approaches to facilitate adaptivity in personalized eLearning systems. The Journal of Information and Systems in Education, 1, 38–44.
      • Cooper, G. und Sweller, J. (1987). The effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347-362.
      • Cooper, G. E. und Harper, R. P. (1969). The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities (NASA Report TN-D-5153). Moffett Field, CA.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Centre.
      • Cooper, G., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P. und Sweller, J. (2001). Learning by imagining. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 68–82.
      • Corbalan, G., Kester, L. und Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006). Towards a personalized task selection model with shared instructional control. Instructional Science, 34, 399-422.
      • Corbalan, G., Kester, L. und van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2009). Combining shared control with variability over surface features: Effects on transfer test performance and task involvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 290-298.
      • Cox, R. (1996). Analytical reasoning with multiple external representations. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
      • Cox, R. und Brna, P. (1995). Supporting the use of external representations in problem solving: The need for flexible learning environments. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6, 239-302.
      • Craig, S. D., Gholson, B. und Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 428-434.
      • Craik, F. I. M. und Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 208-294.
      • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
      • Cronbach, L. J. und Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interaction. New York: Irvington Publishers.
      • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1985). Das Flow-Erlebnis. Jenseits von Angst und Langeweile: im Tun aufgehen. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
      • Csikszentmihalyi, M. und Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (1991). Einführung in Teil IV. In M. Csikszentmihalyi und I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Hrsg.), Die außergewöhnliche Erfahrung im Alltag. Die Psychologie des Flow-Erlebnisses (S. 275-290). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
      • Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
      • Culbertson, H. M. und Powers, R. D. (1959). A study of graph comprehension difficulties. Audio Visual Communication Review, 7, 97-100.
      • Cypra, O. (2005). Warum spielen Menschen in virtuellen Welten? Eine empirische Untersuchung zu Online-Rollenspielen und ihren Nutzern. Verfügbar unter: http://www.staff.uni-mainz.de/cyprao/arbeit.html [5. Juni 2009].

      D

      • Dagger, D., Wade, V. und Conlan, O. (2005). Personalisation for all: Making adaptive course composition easy. Educational Technology and Society, 8, 9-25.
      • Darabi, A. A., Nelson, D. W. und Palanki, S. (2007). Acquisition of troubleshooting skills in a computer simulation: Worked example vs. conventional problem solving instructional strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1809-1819.
      • De Croock, M. B. M., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. und Paas, F. (1998). High versus low contextual interference in simulation-based training of troubleshooting skills: Effects on transfer performance and invested mental effort. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 249-267.
      • De Groot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
      • de Jong, T. (2006). Computer simulations - Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312, 532-533.
      • de Jong, T., Ainsworth, S. E., Dobson, M., van der Hulst, A., Levonen, J., Reimann, P.et al. (1998). Acquiring knowledge in science and math: the use of multiple representations in technology based learning environments. In M. W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen und T. De Jong (Hrsg.), Learning with multiple representations (S. 9-40). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
      • de Jong, T. und van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179-201.
      • De Westelinck, K., Valcke, M., De Craene, B. und Kirschner, P. (2005). Multimedia learning in social sciences: Limitations of external graphical representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 555–573.
      • Dean, R. S. und Enemoh, P. A. C. (1983). Pictorial organization in prose learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 20-27.
      • Dekeyser, H. M. (2001). Student preference for verbal, graphic or symbolic information in an independent learning environment for an applied statistics course. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen und A. Biardeau (Hrsg.), Multimedia learning: Cognitive and instructional Issues (S. 99-109). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
      • DeLeeuw, K. E. und Mayer, R. E. (2008). A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneuous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 223-234.
      • DeStefano, D. und LeFevre, J.-A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1616-1641.
      • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.
      • DGP. (2007). Richtlinien zur Manuskriptgestaltung (3. Auflage). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
      • DGPs und BDP. (1999). Ethische Richtlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie e.V. und des Berufsverbands Deutscher Psychologinnen und Psychologen e.V. [Internet/WWW]. Verfügbar unter: www.bdp-verband.org/bdp/verband/ethik [5. Juni 2009].
      • Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V. und Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176-180.
      • Dickey, M. D. (2007). Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 253-273.
      • Dienes, Z. (1973). The six stages in the process of learning mathematics. Slough, UK: NFER-Nelson.
      • Dillon, A. und Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322-349.
      • Douglas, A. C., Mills, J. E., Niang, M., Stepchenkova, S., Byun, S., Ruffini, C.et al. (2008). Internet addiction: Meta-synthesis of qualitative research for the decade 1996-2006. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 3027-3044.
      • Dowling, G., Tickle, A., Stark, K., Rowe, J. und Godat, M. (2005). Animation of complex data communications concepts may not always yield improved learning outcomes. In A. Young und D. Tolhurst (Hrsg.), Seventh Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2005) (S. 151-154). Newcastle, Australia: Australian Computer Society.
      • Duchowski, A. T. (2002). A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 34, 455-470.
      • Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice (2. Auflage). Berlin: Springer.
      • Dufour-Janvier, B., Bednarz, N. und Belanger, M. (1987). Pedagogical considerations concerning the problem of representation. In C. Janvier (Hrsg.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: NEA.
      • Dunbar, K. (1993). Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science, 17, 397-434.
      • Dwyer, F. M. (1967). Adapting visual illustrations for effective learning. Harvard Educational Review, 37, 250-263.
      • Dwyer, F. M. (1972). A guide for improving visualized instruction. State College, PA: Learning Services.
      • Dwyer, F. M. (1978). Strategies for improving visual learning. State College, Pennsylvania: Learning Sciences.
      • Dyadio, C. (2007). Flash CS3: Einstieg für Anspruchsvolle. München: Addison-Wesley.

      E

      • Ebel, H. F., Bliefert, C. und Greulich, W. (2006). Schreiben und Publizieren in den Naturwissenschaften (5. Auflage). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
      • Engelkamp, J. (1998). Memory for actions. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
      • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T. und Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
      • Esposito, F., Licchelli, O. und Semeraro, G. (2004). Discovering student models in e-learning systems. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10, 47-57.
      • Eysenbach, G. (1995). Computereinsatz und Computerkenntnisse unter Medizinstudenten [Computer use and computer literacy among medical students]. Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie in Medizin und Biologie, 26, 56-66.
      • Eysink, T. H. S., Dijkstra, S. und Kuper, J. (2001). Cognitive processes in solving variants of computer-based problems used in logic teaching. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 1-19.
      • Eysink, T. H. S., Dijkstra, S. und Kuper, J. (2002). The role of guidance in computer-based problem solving for the development of concepts of logic. Instructional Science, 30, 307-333.

      F

      • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. und Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 39, 175-191.
      • Felder, R. M. und Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78, 674-681.
      • Fetherston. (1998). A socio-cognitive framework for researching learning with IMM. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 14, 98-106.
      • Fischer, S., Lowe, R. K. und Schwan, S. (2008). Effects of presentation speed of a dynamic visualization on the understanding of a mechanical system. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1126-1141.
      • Flavell, J. H. und Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. V. Kail und J. W. Hagen (Hrsg.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (S. 3-33). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
      • Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R. und Bright, G. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 124-158.
      • Fürstenberg, A. (2007). Lernen mit Multimedia: Zu den Ursachen des Modalitätseffektes [Abstract]. In K. F. Wender, S. Mecklenbräuker, G. D. Rey und T. Wehr (Hrsg.), Beiträge zur 49. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (S. 231). Lengerich: Pabst.

      G

      • Gaillard, A. W. K. (1992). Werkbelasting is nog geen stress. In P. G. J. Keuss, G. T. Hoopen und A. A. J. Mannaerts (Hrsg.), Stress: werkbelasting, lichamelijke reacties, mentale belasting, slaapgebrek en meetmethoden. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
      • Galley, N. (2001). Physiologische Grundlagen, Meßmethoden und Indikatorfunktion der okulomotorischen Aktivität. In F. Rösler (Hrsg.), Grundlagen und Methoden der Psychophysiologie (S. 237-316). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
      • Garner, R. (1992). Learning from school texts. Eductational Psychologist, 27, 53-63.
      • Garner, R., Brown, R., Sanders, S. und Menke, D. J. (1992). "Seductive details" and learning from text. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi und A. Krapp (Hrsg.), The role of interest in learning and development (S. 239-254). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Garner, R. und Gillingham, M. G. (1991). Topic knowledge, cognitive interest, and text recall: A rnicroanalysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 59, 310-319.
      • Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G. und White, C. S. (1989). Effects of 'seductive details' on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41-57.
      • Garrison, W. T. (1978). The context bound effects of picture-text amalgams: Two studies. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 4137A.
      • Geary, D. (2007). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson und J. R. Levin (Hrsg.), Psychological perspectives on contemporary educational issues (S. 1-99). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
      • Geddes, B. und Stevenson, R. (1997). Explicit learning of a dynamic system with a non-salient pattern. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 50, 742–765.
      • Gentile, D. (2009). Pathological Video-Game Use Among Youth Ages 8 to 18. Psychological Science, 20, 594-602.
      • Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K. und Catrambone, R. (2004). Designing instructional examples to reduce intrinsic cognitive load: molar versus modular presentation of solution procedures. Instructional Science, 32, 33-58.
      • Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K. und Cierniak, G. (2009). The scientific value of cognitive load theory: A research agenda based on the structuralist view of Theories. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 43-54.
      • Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., Opfermann, M., Hesse, F. W. und Eysink, T. H. S. (2009). Learning with hypermedia: The influence of representational formats and different levels of learner control on performance and learning behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 360-370.
      • Ghinea, G. und Chen, S. Y. (2008). Measuring quality of perception in distributed multimedia: Verbalizers vs. imagers. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1317-1329.
      • Gimmler, R. (2007). Computer- und Videospiele. In U. Six, U. Gleich und R. Gimmler (Hrsg.), Kommunikationspsychologie und Medienpsychologie (S. 460-473). Weinheim: Beltz PVU.
      • Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15, 313-331.
      • Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction, 16, 511-525.
      • Ginns, P., Chandler, P. und Sweller, J. (2003). When imagining information is effective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 229-251.
      • Glowalla, U. (2008). Vorlesung und E-Lecture – eine gelungene Symbiose. In G. D. Rey und T. Wehr (Hrsg.), Kognitive Psychologie – Ausgewählte Grundlagen- und Anwendungsbeispiele (S. 109-127). Lengerich: Pabst.
      • Goetz, E. T. und Sadoski, M. (1995a). The perils of seduction revisited: A reply to Wade, Alexander, Schraw und Kulikowich. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 518-519.
      • Goetz, E. T. und Sadoski, M. (1995b). The perils of seduction: Distracting details or incomprehensible abstractions? Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 500-511.
      • Gopher, D. und Braune, R. (1984). On the psychophysics of workload: Why bother with subjective measures? Human Factors, 26, 519-532.
      • Göritz, A. S. (2006). Incentives in Web studies: Methodological issues and a review. International Journal of Internet Science, 1, 58-70.
      • Göritz, A. S., Reinhold, N. und Batinic, B. (2000). Marktforschung mit Online-Panels: State of the Art. Planung und Analyse, 3, 362-367.
      • Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S. und VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through PointandQuery, AutoTutor, and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40, 225-234.
      • Graf, S., Lin, T. und Kinshuk. (2008). The relationship between learning styles and cognitive traits - Getting additional information for improving student modelling. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 122-137.
      • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole und J. Morgan (Hrsg.), Syntax and semantics (Bd. 3, S. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
      • Griffiths, M. D., Davies, M. N. O. und Chappell, D. (2003). Breaking the stereotype: the case of online gaming. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 6, 81-91.
      • Grissom, S., McNally, M. F. und Naps, T. (2003, June). Algorithm visualization in CS education: Comparing levels of student engagement. Vortrag vorgestellt auf dem ACM Symposium on Software Visualization, San Diego, CA.
      • Guan, Y.-H. (2002). Reexamining the modality effect from the perspective of Baddeley's working. In R. Ploetzner (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Dynamic Visualizations and Learning. (S. 1-6). Tübingen: Knowledge Media Research Center.
      • Gunter, G. A., Kenny, R. F. und Vick, E. H. (2008). Taking educational games seriously: using the RETAIN model to design endogenous fantasy into standalone educational games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 511-537.

      H

      • Hadwin, A. F., Wozney, L. und Pontin, O. (2005). Scaffolding the appropriation of self-regulatory activity: A socio-cultural analysis of changes in teacher-student discourse about a graduate research portfolio. Instructional Science, 33, 413-450.
      • Hämäläinen, R., Oksanen, K. und Häkkinen, P. (2008). Designing and analyzing collaboration in a scripted game for vocational education. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2496-2506.
      • Harp, S. F. und Maslich, A. A. (2005). The consequences of including seductive details during lecture. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 100-103.
      • Harp, S. F. und Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92-102.
      • Harp, S. F. und Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 414-434.
      • Hart, S. und Staveland, L. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. Hancock und N. Meshkati (Hrsg.), Human mental workload (S. 139-183). Amsterdam: North Holland B. V.
      • Hartley, J. (1985). Designing instructional text. New York: Nicols.
      • Hawkins, J. (2006). Die Zukunft der Intelligenz. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.
      • Hays, T. A. (1996). Spatial abilities and the effects of computer animation on short-term and long-term memory in learning from multimedia systems. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 139-155.
      • Hede, A. (2002). An integrated model of multimedia effects on learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11, 177-191.
      • Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P. A. und Just, M. A. (1996). Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts. In T. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal und P. D. Pearson (Hrsg.), Handbook of reading research (Bd. 2, S. 641-648). Mahwah, New York: Erlbaum.
      • Hegarty, M., Kriz, S. und Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 325-360.
      • Hegarty, M. und Sims, V. K. (1994). Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 22, 411-430.
      • heise. (2009). Schwedische Suchthelfer: World of Warcraft ist "Kokain der Computerspielewelt". [Internet/WWW]. Verfügbar unter: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Schwedische-Suchthelfer-World-of-Warcraft-ist-Kokain-der-Computerspielewelt--/meldung/133722 [5. Juni 2009].
      • Hendy, C. H., Hamilton, K. M. und Landry, L. N. (1993). Measuring subjective workload: When is one scale better than many? Human Factors, 35, 579-601.
      • Herget, M. und Bögeholz, S. (2005). Empirische Erkenntnisse zu Geschlechterunterschieden beim computergestützten Lernen - Basiswissen für die Konzeption von Lehr-Lern-Arrangements und Unterrichtsforschung. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 11, 207-220.
      • Hesse, F. W. (2006). Autorenwerkzeuge. [Internet/WWW]. Verfügbar unter: http://www.e-teaching.org/technik/aufbereitung/cbt_wbt/autorenwerkzeuge/ [5. Juni 2009].
      • Hicks, T. G. und Wierwille, W. W. (1979). Comparison of five mental workload assessment procedures in a moving-base driving simulator. Human Factors, 21, 129-143.
      • Hidi, S. und Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151-179.
      • Hidi, S. und Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127.
      • Hilbert, T. S. und Renkl, A. (2009). Learning how to use a computer-based concept-mapping tool: Self-explaining examples helps. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 267-274.
      • Hill, S. G., Iavecchia, H. P., Byers, J. C., Bittner, A. C., Zaklad, A. L. und Christ, R. E. (1992). Comparison of four subjective workload rating scales. Human Factors, 34, 429-439.
      • Hockey, G. R. J. (1979). Stress and the cognitive components of skilled performance. In V. Hamilton und D. M. Warburton (Hrsg.), Human stress and cognition: an information processing approach (S. 141-178). Chichester: Wiley.
      • Hockey, G. R. J. (1993). Cognitive energetical control mechanisms in the management of work demands and psychological health. In A. Baddeley und L. Weiskrantz (Hrsg.), Attention: selection, awareness and control (S. 329-345). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
      • Höffler, T. N. und Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722-738.
      • Hofman, R. und van Oostendorp, H. (1999). Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypermedia British. Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 129-140.
      • Homer, B. D., Plass, J. L. und Blake, L. (2008). The effects of video on cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 786-797.
      • Huk, T. (2006). Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 392-404.
      • Hutchinson, P. T. (2003). Dichotomization and manipulation of numbers. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 429-430.
      • Huwendiek, S., Muntau, A. C., Maier, E. M., Tönshoff, B. und Sostmann, K. (2008). E-Learning in der medizinischen Ausbildung. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 156, 458-463.

      I

      • Iacoboni, M., Woods, R., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. und Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526-2528.
      • Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R. und Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2823-2837.
      • Irwin, J. R. und McClelland, G. H. (2002). Negative consequences of dichotomizing continuous predictor variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 366-371.
      • Issing, L. J. (1998). Lernen mit Multimedia aus psychologisch-didaktischer Perspektive. In G. Dörr und K. L. Jüngst (Hrsg.), Lernen mit Medien. Ergebnisse und Perspektiven zu medial vermittelten Lehr- und Lernprozessen (S. 159-178). Weinheim: Juventa.

      J

      • Jacobson, M. J. und Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 301-333.
      • James, W. (1890/1950). Principles of psychology: Volume I. New York: Dover Press.
      • Jamet, E., Gavota, M. und Quaireau, C. (2008). Attention guiding in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 18, 135-145.
      • Jamet, E. und Le Bohec, O. (2007). The effect of redundant text in multimedia instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 588-598.
      • Jelsma, O. und Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1989). Contextual interference: Interactions with reflection-impulsivity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 1055-1064.
      • Jenkins, J. J. (1978). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In L. S. Cermak und F. I. M. Craik (Hrsg.), Levels of processing and human memory (S. 429-446). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
      • Johnson, P. und Nemetz, F. (1998). Towards principles for the design and evaluation of multimedia systems. In H. Johnson, L. Nigay und C. Roast (Hrsg.), People and Computers XIII (Proceedings of the HCI’98) (S. 255-271). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
      • Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Designing hypertext for learning. In E. Scanlon und T. O'Shea (Hrsg.), New directions in educational technology (S. 123-130). Berlin: Springer.
      • Jonassen, D. H., Lee, C. B., Yang, C.-C. und Laffey, J. (2005). The collaboration principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 247-270). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Junker, R. und Scherer, S. (2006). Evolution - ein kritisches Lehrbuch (6. Auflage). Gießen: Weyel.

      K

      • Kabassi, K. und Virvou, M. (2006). Multi-attribute utility theory and adaptive techniques for intelligent web-based educational software. Instructional Science, 34, 131-158.
      • Kalyuga, S. (2005). Prior knowledge principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 325-337). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Kalyuga, S. (2006). Assessment of learners' organised knowledge structures in adaptive learning environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 333-342.
      • Kalyuga, S. (2007a). Enhancing instructional efficiency of interactive E-learning environments: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 387-399.
      • Kalyuga, S. (2007b). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509-539.
      • Kalyuga, S. (2008). Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: An effect of learner prior knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 852-861.
      • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. und Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
      • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. und Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 126-136.
      • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. und Sweller, J. (2001). Learner experience and efficiency of instructional guidance. Educational Psychology, 21, 5-23.
      • Kalyuga, S. und Sweller, J. (2005). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive E-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 83-93.
      • Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H. und Jessell, T. M. (Hrsg.). (1995). Neurowissenschaften. Eine Einführung. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
      • Kanner, J. H., Runyon, R. P. und Desiderato, O. (1954). Television in army training: Evaluation of television in army training. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Human Resources Research Office.
      • Kanner, J. M. und Rosenstein, A. J. (1960). Television in army training: Color vs. black and white. AV Communication Review, 8, 243-252.
      • Kant, I. (1787/1986). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Ditzingen: Reclam.
      • Kaput, J. J. (1989). Linking representations in the symbol systems of algebra. In S. Wagner und C. Kieran (Hrsg.), Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (S. 167-194). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
      • Karakaya, F., Ainscough, T. L. und Chopoorian, J. (2001). The effects of class size and learning style on student performance in a multimedia-based marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 84-90.
      • Karakus, T., Inal, Y. und Cagiltay, K. (2008). A descriptive study of Turkish high school students' game-playing characteristics and their considerations concerning the effects of games. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2520-2529.
      • Kareal, F. und Klema, J. (2006). Adaptivity in e-learning. In A. Méndez-Vilas, A. Solano, J. Mesa und J. A. Mesa (Hrsg.), Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education (Bd. 1, S. 260-264). Badajoz, Spain: Formatex.
      • Katz, I. und Assor, A. (2007). When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 429-442.
      • Ke, F. (2008). Computer games application within alternative classroom goal structures: cognitive, metacognitive, and affective evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 539-556.
      • Kempter, G. und Bente, G. (2004). Psychophysiologische Wirkungsforschung: Grundlagen und Anwendungen. In R. Mangold, P. Vorderer und G. Bente (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Medienpsychologie (S. 271-295). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
      • Kennedy, G. E. (2004). Promoting cognition in multimedia interactivity research. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15, 43-61.
      • Kerres, M. (2006). Potenziale von Web 2.0 nutzen. In A. Hohenstein und K. Wilbers (Hrsg.), Handbuch E-Learning. München: DWD.
      • Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 898-921.
      • Kettanurak, V., Ramamurthy, K. und Haseman, W. D. (2001). User attitude as amediator of learning performance improvement in an interactive multimedia environment: an empirical investigation of the degree of interactivity and learning styles. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 54, 541-583.
      • Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., Dietrich, A. und Roth, R. (2007). A methodological approach to address individual factors and gender differences in adaptive eLearning. In K. Siebenhandl, M. Wagner und S. Zauchner (Hrsg.), Gender in E-Learning and Educational Games: A Reader (S. 71-84): Studienverlag Ges.m.b.H.
      • Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., Schwarz, D., Albert, D., Verpoorten, D., Castaigne, J.-L. und Bopp, M. (2006). The ELEKTRA project: Towards a new learning experience. In M. Pohl, A. Holzinger, R. Motschnig und C. Swertz (Hrsg.), M3 – Interdisciplinary aspects on digital media and education (S. 19-48). Wien: Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft.
      • Kiewra, K. A. und Creswell, J. W. (2000). Conversations with three highly productive educational psychologists: Richard Anderson, Richard Mayer, and Michael Pressley. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 135-161.
      • Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
      • Kintsch, W. und van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
      • Kinzie, M. B. und Joseph, D. R. D. (2008). Gender differences in game activity preferences of middle school children: implications for educational game design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 643-663.
      • Kirschner, F., Paas, F. und Kirschner, P. A. (2009a). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 31-42.
      • Kirschner, F., Paas, F. und Kirschner, P. A. (2009b). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 306-314.
      • Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 1-10.
      • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J. und Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
      • Klahr, D. und Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1-48.
      • Klein, P. D. (2003). Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: alternatives to 'learning styles' and 'multiple intelligences'. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 45-81.
      • Kleinbeck, U. (1996). Arbeitsmotivation: Entstehung, Wirkung und Förderung. Weinheim: Juventa.
      • Klimmt, C. (2004). Computer- und Videospiele. In R. Mangold, P. Vorderer und G. Bente (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Medienpsychologie (S. 695-716). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
      • Knauff, M. und Johnson-Laird, P. (2002). Visual imagery can impede reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 30, 363-371.
      • Knauff, M. und Strube, G. (2002). Anschauliches Denken und Arbeitsgedächtnis: Kognitive und kortikale Prozesse. Psychologische Rundschau, 53, 49-60.
      • Koedinger, K. R. und Aleven, V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 239-264.
      • Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
      • Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 7-19.
      • Kozma, R. B. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13, 205-226.
      • Kozma, R. B. und Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 949-968.
      • Kozma, R. B., Russell, J., Jones, T., Marx, N. und Davis, J. (1996). The use of multiple, linked representations to facilitate science understanding. In S. Vosniadou, R. Glaser, E. DeCorte und H. Mandl (Hrsg.), International perspectives on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments (S. 41-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Kraft, M. E. (1961). A study of information and vocabulary achievement from the teaching of natural science by television in the fifth grade. Boston University.
      • Kraft, R. J. und Sakofs, M. (Hrsg.). (1989). The theory of experiential education. Boulder, CO: Association for Experiential Education.
      • Kraus, L. A., Reed, W. M. und Fitzgerald, G. E. (2001). The effects of learning style and hypermedia prior experience on behavioral disorders knowledge and time on task: A case-based hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 125-140.
      • Krause, U. M., Stark, R. und Mandl, H. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning in statistics. Learning and Instruction, 19, 158-170.
      • Krombass, A., Urhahne, D. und Harms, U. (2007). Flow-Erleben von Schülerinnen und Schülern beim Lernen mit Computern und Ausstellungsobjekten in einem Naturkundemuseum. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 13, 87-101.
      • Krüger, M. und Krist, H. (2007). Der Einfluss motorischer Prozesse bei der Entwicklung der mentalen Rotation [Abstract]. In K. F. Wender, S. Mecklenbräuker, G. D. Rey und T. Wehr (Hrsg.), Beiträge zur 49. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (S. 296). Lengerich: Pabst.
      • Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178-181.
      • Kulhavy, R. W., Stock, W. A. und Caterino, L. C. (1994). Reference maps as a framework for remembering text. In W. Schnotz und R. W. Kulhavy (Hrsg.), Comprehension of graphics (S. 153-162). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B. V.
      • Kunnath, M. L. A., Cornell, R. A., Kysilka, M. K. und Witta, L. (2007). An experimental research study on the effect of pictorial icons on a user-learner's performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1454-1480.
      • Kunz, G. C., Drewniak, U. und Schott, F. (1989, March). On-line and off-line assessment of self-regulation in learning from instructional text and picture. Vortrag vorgestellt auf dem Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

      L

      • Lajoie, S. P. (2005). Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science, 33, 541-557.
      • Laner, S. (1955). Some factors influencing the effectiveness of an instructional film. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 280-292.
      • Langer, I., Schulz von Thun, F. und Tausch, R. (2006). Sich verständlich ausdrücken (8. Auflage). München: Reinhardt.
      • Latané, B., Williams, K. D. und Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832.
      • Lawless, K. A. und Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25, 117-131.
      • Lawson, A. E. (2002). Sound and faulty arguments generated by preservice biology teachers when testing hypotheses involving unobservable entities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 237-252.
      • Leahy, W., Chandler, P. und Sweller, J. (2003). When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 401-418.
      • Leahy, W. und Sweller, J. (2005). Interactions among the imagination, expertise reversal, and element interactivity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 266-276.
      • LeFevre, J.-A. und Dixon, P. (1986). Do written instructions need examples? Cognition and Instruction, 3, 1-30.
      • Lehman, S., Schraw, G., McCrudden, M. T. und Hartley, K. (2007). Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 569-587.
      • Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O. und Stein, M. M. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: tasks, learning and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60, 1-64.
      • Lenzner, A. (2009). Visuelle Wissenskommunikation: Effekte von Bildern beim Lernen. Kognitive, affektive und motivationale Effekte. Hamburg: Kovac.
      • Leonard, D. (2003). Live in your world, play in ours: Race, video games, and consuming the other. Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education, 3, 1-9.
      • Levie, H. W. und Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 195-232.
      • Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J. und Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D. M. Willows und H. A. Houghton (Hrsg.), The psychology of illustration (Bd. 1, S. 51-86). New York: Springer.
      • Lewalter, D. (1997). Lernen mit Bildern und Animationen: Studie zum Einfluss von Lernmerkmalen auf die Effektivität von Illustrationen. In D. H. Rost (Hrsg.), Pädagogische Psychologie und Entwicklungspsychologie (Bd. 2). Münster: Waxmann.
      • Lewis, E. L., Stern, J. L. und Linn, M. C. (1993). The effect of computer simulations on introductory thermodynamics understanding. Educational Technology, 33, 45-58.
      • Lieberman, H. (1986). An example-based environment for beginning programmers. Instructional Science, 14, 277-292.
      • Liegle, J. O. und Janicki, T. N. (2006). The effect of learning styles on the navigation needs of Web-based learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 885-898.
      • Lin, X. und Lehman, J. D. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 837-858.
      • Linn, M. C. und Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
      • Locke, E. A. und Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
      • Lohmann, D. F. (1986). Predicting mathemathanic effects in the teaching of higher-order thinking skills. Educational Psychologist, 21, 191-208.
      • Lohninger, H. (2008). Grundlagen der Statistik. [Internet/WWW]. Verfügbar unter: http://www.statistics4u.info/fundstat_germ/ [5. Juni 2009].
      • Lohse, G. L., Biolsi, K., Walker, N. und Rueler, H. (1994). A classification of visual representations. Communications of the A.C.M., 37, 36-49.
      • Loman, N. L. und Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 402-412.
      • Lorch, R. F. J. und Lorch, E. P. (1996). Effects of headings on text recall and summarization. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 261-278.
      • Low, R. und Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 147-158). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 225-244.
      • Loyens, S. M. M. und Gijbels, D. (2008). Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments: introducing a multi-directional approach. Instructional Science, 36, 351-357.

      M

      • Madrid, R. I., Van Oostendorp, H. und Melguizo, M. C. P. (2009). The effects of the number of links and navigation support on cognitive load and learning with hypertext: The mediating role of reading order. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 66-75.
      • Maki, R. H. (1998). Test predictions over text material. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky und A. C. Graesser (Hrsg.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (S. 117-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
      • Mangold, R. (2004). Infotainment und Edutainment. In R. Mangold, P. Vorderer und G. Bente (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Medienpsychologie (S. 527-542). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
      • Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W. und de Jong, T. (2006). Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 87-98.
      • Marcus, N., Cooper, M. und Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 49-63.
      • Masters, M. S. und Sanders, B. (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics, 23, 337-341.
      • Mautone, P. D. und Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 377-389.
      • Mautone, P. D. und Mayer, R. E. (2007). Cognitive aids for guiding graph comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 640-652.
      • Mawer, R. F. und Sweller, J. (1982). Effects of subgoal density and location on learning during problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 8, 252-259.
      • Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 611-624.
      • Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125–139.
      • Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three strike rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14-19.
      • Mayer, R. E. (2005a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 31-48). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Mayer, R. E. (2005b). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 1-16). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Mayer, R. E. (2005c). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 169-182). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Mayer, R. E. (2005d). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 183-200). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Mayer, R. E. (2005e). Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: Personalization, voice, and image principles. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 201-212). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Mayer, R. E. (2006). Ten research-based principles of multimedia learning. In H. F. O'Neil und R. S. Perez (Hrsg.), Web-based learning (S. 371-392). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
      • Mayer, R. E. (2008). Old advice for new researchers. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 19-28.
      • Mayer, R. E. und Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484-490.
      • Mayer, R. E. und Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444-452.
      • Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R. und Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 64-73.
      • Mayer, R. E. und Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390–397.
      • Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. und Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 806-813.
      • Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L. und Campbell, J. (2004). A personalization effect in multimedia learning: Students learn better when words are in conversational style rather than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 389-395.
      • Mayer, R. E. und Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.
      • Mayer, R. E., Griffith, E., Jurkowitz, I. T. N. und Rothman, D. (2008). Increased interestingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation leads to decreased learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 329-339.
      • Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S. und Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 256-265.
      • Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J. und Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187-198.
      • Mayer, R. E. und Jackson, J. (2005). The case for coherence in scientific explanations: Quantitative details can hurt qualitative understanding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 13-18.
      • Mayer, R. E. und Johnson, C. I. (2008). Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 380-386.
      • Mayer, R. E., Mathias, A. und Wetzell, K. (2002). Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 147-154.
      • Mayer, R. E., Mautone, P. D. und Prothero, W. (2002). Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 171-185.
      • Mayer, R. E. und Moreno, R. (1998a, April). A cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Implications for design principles. Vortrag vorgestellt auf dem CHI-98 Workshop on Hyped-Media to Hyper-Media, Los Angeles, USA.
      • Mayer, R. E. und Moreno, R. (1998b). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.
      • Mayer, R. E. und Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87-99.
      • Mayer, R. E. und Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43-52.
      • Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R., Boire, M. und Vagge, S. (1999). Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 638-643.
      • Mayer, R. E., Sims, V. und Tajika, H. (1995). A comparison of how textbooks teach mathematical problem solving in Japan and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 443-460.
      • Mayer, R. E. und Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389-401.
      • Mayer, R. E., Sobko, K. und Mautone, P. D. (2003). Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 419-425.
      • Mayer, R. E., Stiehl, C. und Greeno, J. (1975). Acquisition of understanding and skill in relation to subjects' preparation and meaningfulness of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 331-350.
      • Mayrath, M. C. (2008). Attributions of productive authors in educational psychology journals. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 41-56.
      • McCormick, C. B. und Barnes, B. J. (2008). Getting started in academia: A guide for educational psychologists. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 5-18.
      • McGee, M. M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889-918.
      • McGuinness, C. (1990). Talking about thinking: The role of metacognition in teaching thinking. In K. Gilhooly, M. Deane und G. Erdos (Hrsg.), Linkes of thinking (Bd. 2, S. 310-312). San Diego: Academic.
      • McNeil, B. J. und Nelson, K. R. (1991). Meta-analysis of interactive video instruction: A 10-year review of achievement effects. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, 1-6.
      • McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K. und Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75, 531-566.
      • Meier, R. (2006). Praxis E-Learning. Offenbach: GABAL.
      • Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
      • Miller, W. (1937). The picture crutch in reading. Elementary English Review, 14, 263-264.
      • Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Hrsg.), The psychology of computer vision (S. 211-277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
      • Montali, J. und Lewandowski, L. (1996). Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 271-279.
      • Moore, P. J. und Scevak, J. J. (1997). Learning from texts and visual aids: a developmental perspective. Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 205-223.
      • Moosbrugger, H. (2002). Lineare Modelle: Regressions- und Varianzanalysen (3. Auflage). Bern: Huber.
      • Moreno, R. (2005). Instructional technology: Promise and pitfalls. In L. PytlikZillig, M. Bodvarsson und R. Bruning (Hrsg.), Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together (S. 1-19). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
      • Moreno, R. (2006). Learning in High-Tech and Multimedia Environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 63-67.
      • Moreno, R. und Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments: Special issue on interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309-326.
      • Moreno, R. und Mayer, R. E. (1999a). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358-368.
      • Moreno, R. und Mayer, R. E. (1999b). Multimedia-supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 215-248.
      • Moreno, R. und Mayer, R. E. (2000a). Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 724-733.
      • Moreno, R. und Mayer, R. E. (2000b, 16. Juli 2007). A learner-centered approach to multimedia explanations: Deriving instructional design principles from cognitive theory. [Internet/WWW]. Verfügbar unter: http://www.imej.wfu.edu/articles/2000/2/05/printver.asp [5. Juni 2009].
      • Moreno, R. und Mayer, R. E. (2002a). Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 598-610.
      • Moreno, R. und Mayer, R. E. (2002b). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 156-163.
      • Moreno, R. und Mayer, R. E. (2004). Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 165-173.
      • Moreno, R. und Mayer, R. E. (2005). Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 117-128.
      • Muntean, C. H. und Muntean, G.-M. (2009). Open corpus architecture for personalised ubiquitous e-learning, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13, 197-205.
      • Muthukumar, S. L. (2005). Creating interactive multimedia-based educational courseware: cognition in learning. Cognition, Technology and Work, 7, 46-50.

      N

      • Najjar, L. J. (1995). Does multimedia information help people learn? Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center.
      • Najjar, L. J. (1997). A framework for learning from media: The effects of materials, tasks, and tests on performance. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 59(6-B), 3084.
      • Najjar, L. J. (1998). Principles of educational multimedia interface design. Human Factors, 40, 311-323.
      • Najjar, L. J. (2005, July). Accessible Java application user interface design guidelines. HCI International 2005 Proceedings, Mahwah, NJ.
      • Narciss, S., Proske, A. und Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1126-1144.
      • Naumann, J., Richter, T., Flender, J., Christmann, U. und Groeben, N. (2007). Signaling in expository hypertexts compensates for deficits in reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 791-807.
      • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton, Century, Crofts.
      • Nelson, T. O. und Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Hrsg.), The psychology of learning and motivation (S. 125-173). New York: Academic Press.
      • Nerdinger, F. W. (1995). Motivation und Handeln in Organisationen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
      • Nieding, G. und Ohler, P. (2004). Laborexperimentelle Methoden. In R. Mangold, P. Vorderer und G. Bente (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Medienpsychologie (S. 355-376). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
      • Niegemann, H. M., Hessel, S., Hochscheid-Mauel, D., Aslanski, K., Deimann, M. und Kreuzberger, G. (2004). Kompendium E-Learning. Berlin: Springer.
      • Njoo, M. und de Jong, T. (1993). Supporting exploratory learning by offering structured overviews of hypotheses. In D. Towne, T. de Jong und H. Spada (Hrsg.), Simulation-based experiential learning (S. 207-225). Berlin: Springer.
      • Novick, L. R., Hurley, S. M. und Francis, M. (1999). Evidence for abstract, schematic knowledge of three spatial diagram representations. Memory and Cognition, 27, 288-308.
      • Noyes, J. und Garland, K. (2006). Explaining students' attitudes toward books and computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 351-363.

      O

      • O'Donnell, C. R. und Eggemeier, F. T. (1986). Workload assessment methodology. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman und J. P. Thomas (Hrsg.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. II. Cognitive processes and performance (S. 42.41-42.29). New York: Wiley-Interscience.
      • Oblinger, D. G. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 8, 1-18.
      • Orvis, K. A., Horn, D. B. und Belanich, J. (2008). The roles of task difficulty and prior videogame experience on performance and motivation in instructional videogames. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2415-2433.
      • Owen, E. und Sweller, J. (1985). What do students learn while solving mathematics problems? Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 272-284.

      P

      • Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429-434.
      • Paas, F., Camp, G. und Rikers, R. (2001). Instructional compensation for age-related cognitive declines: Effects of goal specificity in maze learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 181-186.
      • Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H. und Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63-71.
      • Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. und Darabi, A. A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 25-34.
      • Paas, F. und Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122-133.
      • Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. und Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 419-430.
      • Paechter, M. (2007). Wissensvermittlung, Lernen und Bildung mit Medien. In U. Six, U. Gleich und R. Gimmler (Hrsg.), Kommunikationspsychologie und Medienpsychologie (S. 372-387). Weinheim: Beltz PVU.
      • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
      • Palmiter, S. und Elkerton, J. (1992). An evaluation of animated demonstrations for learning computer-based tasks. In P. Bauersfeld, J. Bennett und G. Lynch (Hrsg.), CHI'92 conference proceedings (S. 257-263). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
      • Parrish, P. E. (2004). The trouble with learning objects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 49-67.
      • Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory and Cognition, 17, 398-422.
      • Peterson, L. und Peterson, M. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193-198.
      • Petre, M. und Green, T. R. G. (1993). Learning to read graphics: Some evidence that 'seeing' an information display is an acquired skill. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 4, 55-70.
      • Peugh, J. L. und Enders, C. K. (2004). Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74, 525-556.
      • Pezdek, K., Lehrer, A. und Simon, S. (1984). The relationship between reading and cognitive processing of television and radio. Child Development, 55, 2072-2082.
      • Piaget, J. (1928). Judgement and reasoning in the child. New York: Harcourt.
      • Pillay, H. (1994). Cognitive load and mental rotation: structuring orthographic projection for learning and problem solving. Instructional Science, 22, 91-113.
      • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Motivation and classroom learning. In W. M. Reynolds und G. E. Miller (Hrsg.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (S. 103-122). New York: Wiley.
      • Pirolli, P. L. (1991). Effects of examples and their explanations in a lesson on recursion: A production system analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 207-259.
      • Pollock, E., Chandler, P. und Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61-86.
      • Poon, R., Szabo, M. und Ally, M. (1977, June). The role of visual testing when learning from instructional multimedia. Vortrag vorgestellt auf dem ED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM 97 meeting, Calgary, Alberta.
      • Popper, K. R. (1996). Alles Leben ist Problemlösen: über Erkenntnis, Geschichte und Politik. München: Piper.
      • Preece, J. (1993). Graphs are not straightforward. In T. R. G. Green, S. J. Payne und G. C. van der Veer (Hrsg.), The psychology of computer use (S. 41-56). London: Academic Press.
      • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S. und Carey, T. (1994). Human-Computer Interaction. Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.
      • Price, S. (2004). Processing animation: Integrating information from animated diagrams. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2980, 360-364.
      • Puntambekar, S. und Stylianou, A. (2005). Designing navigation support in hypertext systems based on navigation patterns. Instructional Science, 33, 451-481.

      Q

      • Quaiser-Pohl, C., Lehmann, W. und Schirra, J. (2001). Sind Studentinnen der Computervisualistik besonders gut in der Raumvorstellung? Psychologische Aspekte bei der Wahl eines Studienfachs. FIfF Kommunikation, 18, 42-46.
      • Quilici, J. L. und Mayer, R. E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 144-161.
      • Quintana, C., Zhang, M. und Krajcik, J. (2005). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40, 235-244.

      R

      • Recker, M. und Pirolli, P. (1995). Modeling individual differences in students' learning strategies. The Journal of the Learning Science, 4, 1-38.
      • Reder, L. und Anderson, J. (1982). Effects of spacing and embellishment on memory for main points of a text. Memory and Cognition, 10, 97-102.
      • Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive architectures for multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 41, 87-98.
      • Reeves, B. und Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
      • Reid, G. B. und Nygren, T. E. (1988). The subjective workload assessment technique: A scaling procedure for measuring mental workload. In P. A. Hancock und N. Meshkati (Hrsg.), Human mental workload (S. 185-218). Amsterdam: Norh Holland.
      • Reinhardt, K. (2008). Vom Wissen zum Buch – Fach- und Sachbücher schreiben. Bern: Huber.
      • Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1-29.
      • Renkl, A. (2004). Pädagogische Psychologie des Lernen und Lehrens. [Internet/WWW]. Verfügbar unter: www4.psychologie.uni-freiburg.de/einrichtungen/Paedagogische/lehre/paedpsy/vlpp2.ppt [8. September 2006].
      • Renkl, A. (2005). The worked-out examples principles in multimedia. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 229-245). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Renkl, A. und Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38, 15-22.
      • Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K. und Grosse, C. S. (2004). How fading worked solution steps works - A cognitive load perspective. Instructional Science, 32, 59-82.
      • Renkl, A., Gruber, H., Weber, S., Lerche, T. und Schweizer, K. (2003). Cognitive Load beim Lernen mit Lösungsbeispielen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17, 93-101.
      • Resnick, L. B. und Omanson, S. (1987). Learning to understand arithmetic. In R. Glaser (Hrsg.), Advances in instructional psychology (S. 41-95). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
      • Rey, G. D. (2008a). Gestaltungsempfehlungen für multimediale Lernumgebungen. Zur Gestaltung dynamischer, interaktiver Visualisierungen. Saarbrücken: VDM.
      • Rey, G. D. (2008b). Zusammenhänge zwischen Evaluationen von und Lernleistungen in multimedialen Lernumgebungen. In G. D. Rey und T. Wehr (Hrsg.), Kognitive Psychologie – Ausgewählte Grundlagen- und Anwendungsbeispiele (S. 181-192). Lengerich: Pabst.
      • Rey, G. D. (eingereicht). Seductive details in multimedia messages. Computers in Human Behavior.
      • Rey, G. D. und Wender, K. F. (2008). Neuronale Netze. Eine Einführung in die Grundlagen, Anwendungen und Datenauswertung. Bern: Huber.
      • Rickards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F. und Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, notetaking, and field independence-dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 508-517.
      • Rieber, L. P. (1989). The effects of computer animated elaboration strategies and practice on factual and application learning in an elementary science lesson. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 431-444.
      • Rieber, L. P. (1990a). Animation in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 77-86.
      • Rieber, L. P. (1990b). Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 135-140.
      • Rieber, L. P. (2005). Multimedia learning in games, simulations, and microworlds. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 549-567). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Rikers, R. M. J. P., Van Gerven, P. W. M. und Schmidt, H. G. (2004). Cognitive Load Theory as a tool for expertise development. Instructional Science, 32, 173-182.
      • Rittschof, K. A. (im Druck). Field dependence-independence as visuospatial and executive functioning in working memory: implications for instructional systems design and research. Educational Technology Research and Development.
      • Rivers, R. H. und Vockell, E. (1987). Computer simulations to stimulate scientific problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 403-415.
      • Roberts, M. J., Gilmore, D. J. und Wood, D. J. (1997). Individual differences and strategy selection in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 473-492.
      • Robinson, W. R. (2004). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 81, 10-13.
      • Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A. und Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677-688.
      • Rogers, Y. (1999). Commentary: What is different about interactive graphical representations? Learning and Instruction, 9, 419-425.
      • Rohrer, D. und Taylor, K. (2007). The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional Science, 35, 481-498.
      • Roskam, A. J., Brookhuis, K. A., de Waard, D., Carsten, O. M. J., Read, L., Jamson, S.et al. (2002). HASTE deliverable 1 - development of experimental protocol. [Internet/WWW]. Verfügbar unter: http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/projects/haste/HASTE%20Deliverable%201%20v1.1.pd f#search=%22HASTE%20deliverable%201%20-%20development%20of%20experimental%20protocol%22 [5. Juni 2009].
      • Rößling, G. (2004). Integration von Algorithmenanimationen in die Lehre mittels ANIMAL. [Internet/WWW]. Verfügbar unter: http://elara.tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/Publications/2004/05_roessling.pdf [5. Juni 2009].
      • Rost, D. H. (2005). Interpretation und Bewertung pädagogisch-psychologischer Studien. Weinheim: Beltz UTB.
      • Rourke, A. und Sweller, J. (2009). The worked-example effect using ill-defined problems: Learning to recognise designers' styles. Learning and Instruction, 19, 185-199.
      • Royston, P., Altman, D. G. und Sauerbrei, W. (2006). Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: A bad idea. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 127-141.
      • Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J. und Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of E-Learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81, 207-212.
      • Rummer, R. (2007). Lernen mit Multimedia: Blickbewegungen beim Lesen stören das kurzfristige Behalten räumlicher Konstellationen [Abstract]. In K. F. Wender, S. Mecklenbräuker, G. D. Rey und T. Wehr (Hrsg.), Beiträge zur 49. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (S. 230). Lengerich: Pabst.
      • Rustenbach, S. J. (2003). Metaanalyse: eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Bern: Huber.

      S

      • Salden, R. J. C. M., Paas, F., Broers, N. J. und Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Mental effort and performance as determinants for the dynamic selection of learning tasks in air traffic control training. Instructional Science, 32, 153-172.
      • Salden, R. J. C. M., Paas, F. und Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006). Personalised adaptive task selection in air traffic control: Effects on training efficiency and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 16, 350-362.
      • Salomon, G. (1984). Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647-658.
      • Sanchez, C. A. und Wiley, J. (2006). An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity. Memory and Cognition, 34, 344-355.
      • Sarrafzadeh, A., Alexander, S., Dadgostar, F., Fan, C. und Bigdeli, A. (2008). "How do you know that I don't understand?" A look at the future of intelligent tutoring systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1342-1363.
      • Sarris, V. (1999). Einführung in die experimentelle Psychologie. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
      • Sarris, V. und Reiß, S. (2005). Kurzer Leitfaden der Experimentalpsychologie. München: Pearson Studium.
      • Sawicka, A. (2008). Dynamics of cognitive load theory: A model-based approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1041-1066.
      • Scaife, M. und Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representation work? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 45, 185-213.
      • Scalise, K., Bernbaum, D. J., Timms, M., Harrell, S. V., Burmester, K., Kennedy, C. A.et al. (2007). Adaptive technology for E-Learning: Principles and case studies of an emerging field. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2295-2309.
      • Scanlon, E. (1998). How beginning students use graphs of motion. In M. W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen und T. de Jong (Hrsg.), Learning with multiple representations (S. 9-40). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
      • Schank, R. C. (1979). Interestingness: Controlling inferences. Artificial Intelligence, 12, 273-297.
      • Schank, R. C. und Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S. und John, J. (1995). Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 131-166.
      • Schaumburg, H. und Issing, L. J. (2004). Interaktives Lernen mit Multimedia. In R. Mangold, P. Vorderer und G. Bente (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Medienpsychologie (S. 717-742). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
      • Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P. und Schuh, J. (2003). Are multiple examples necessary for schema induction? In F. Schmalhofer, R. Young und G. Katz (Hrsg.), Proceedings of EuroCogSci 03. The European Cognitive Science Conference 2003 (S. 283-288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350-353.
      • Schnotz, W. (1994). Wissenserwerb mit logischen Bildern. In B. Weidenmann (Hrsg.), Wissenserwerb mit Bildern (S. 95-147). Bern: Huber.
      • Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 49-69). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Schnotz, W. (2006). Pädagogische Psychologie. Weinheim: Beltz PVU.
      • Schnotz, W. (2009). Kognition und E-Learning. Gastvortrag gehalten am 22. Januar 2009 am Lehrstuhl für Psychologie IV, Pädagogische Psychologie und Entwicklungspsychologie der Universität Würzburg, Würzburg.
      • Schnotz, W. und Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141-156.
      • Schnotz, W., Böckheler, J., Grzondziel, H., Gärtner, I. und Wächter, M. (1998). Individuelles und kooperatives Lernen mit interaktiven animierten Bildern [Individual and co-operative learning with interactive animated pictures]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 12, 135-145.
      • Schnotz, W. und Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 469-508.
      • Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J. P. und Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Hrsg.), Advances in instructional psychology (Bd. 4, S. 55-175). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
      • Schrader, P. G. und McCreery, M. (2008). The acquisition of skill and expertise in massively multiplayer online games, Education Technology Research and Development, 56, 557–574.
      • Schraw, G. (1998). Processing and recall differences among seductive details. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 3-12.
      • Schraw, G. und Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 23-52.
      • Schreier, M. (2004). Qualitative Methoden. In R. Mangold, P. Vorderer und G. Bente (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Medienpsychologie (S. 377-399). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
      • Schroer, J. und Hertel, G. (2009). Voluntary engagement in an open web-based encyclopedia: Wikipedians and why they do it. Media Psychology, 12, 96-120.
      • Schumann, H. und Müller, W. (2000). Visualisierung: Grundlagen und allgemeine Methoden. Berlin: Springer.
      • Schwan, S., Garsoffky, B. und Hesse, F. W. (2000). Do film cuts facilitate the perceptual and cognitive organization of activity sequences? Memory and Cognition, 28, 214-223.
      • Schwonke, R., Hauser, S., Nückles, M. und Renkl, A. (2006). Enhancing computer-supported writing of learning protocols by adaptive prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 77-92.
      • Segal, J. und Ahmad, K. (1993). The role of examples in the leaching of programming languages. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9, 115-129.
      • Semmer, N. und Udris, I. (2004). Bedeutung und Wirkung von Arbeit. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch Organisationspsychologie (3. Auflage, S. 157-195). Bern: Huber.
      • Seufert, T. (1999, August). Processes of coherence formation in learning with multiple graphical displays. Vortrag vorgestellt auf dem 8th EARLI-conference, Göteborg, Schweden.
      • Seufert, T. und Brünken, R. (2004). Supporting coherence formation in multimedia learning. In P. Gerjets, P. A. Kirschner, J. Elen und R. Joiner (Hrsg.), Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer- supported learning. Proceedings of the first joint meeting of the EARLI SIGs Instructional Design and Learning and Instruction with Computers (S. 138-147). Tübingen: Knowledge Media Research Center.
      • Seufert, T., Jänen, I. und Brünken, R. (2007). The impact of intrinsic cognitive load on the effectiveness of graphical help for coherence formation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1055-1071.
      • Shapiro, A. M. (2008). Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 29-44.
      • Shneiderman, B. (1997). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective Human-Computer Interaction (3. Auflage). Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley.
      • Shotsberger, P. G. (1999). Forms of synchronous dialogue resulting from web-based professional development. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 2, 1777-1782.
      • Shute, V. und Towle, B. (2003). Adaptive E-Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 105-114.
      • Sims, V. K. und Hegarty, M. (1997). Mental animation in the visuospatial sketchpad: Evidence from dual-task studies. Memory and Cognition, 25, 321-333.
      • Sims, V. K. und Mayer, R. E. (2002). Domain specificity of spatial expertise: The case of computer game players. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 97-115.
      • Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching Machines: From the experimental study of learning come devices which arrange optimal conditions for self-instruction. Science, 128, 969-977.
      • Smith, S. M. und Woody, P. C. (2000). Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 220-224.
      • Snow, R. E. und Lohmann, D. F. (1984). Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 347-376.
      • Solso, R. L. (2004). Kognitive Psychologie. Berlin: Springer.
      • Spector, J. M. und Ross, S. M. (2008). Special thematic issue on game-based learning. Education Technology Research and Development, 56, 509-510.
      • Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J. und Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In V. Patel (Hrsg.), Tenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (S. 375-383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J. und Coulson, R. L. (1992a). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. M. Duffy und D. J. Jonassen (Hrsg.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (S. 121-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J. und Coulson, R. L. (1992b). Knowledge representation, content specification, and the development of skill in situation-specific knowledge assembly: Some constructivist issues as they relate to Cognitive Flexibility Theory and hypertext. In T. M. Duffy und D. J. Jonassen (Hrsg.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (S. 57-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Spiro, R. J. und Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility, random access instruction, and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix und R. J. Spiro (Hrsg.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (S. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Spiro, R. J., Vispoel, W. L., Schmitz, J. G., Samarapungavan, A. und Boerger, A. E. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. In B. K. Britton und S. M. Glynn (Hrsg.), Executive control processes in reading (S. 177-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Spitzer, M. (2007). Lernen. Gehirnforschung und die Schule des Lebens. Berlin: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
      • Stark, R., Mandl, H., Gruber, H. und Renkl, A. (2002). Conditions and effects of example elaboration. Learning and Instruction, 12, 39-60.
      • Steffens, M. C., Buchner, A. und Wender, K. F. (2003). Quite ordinary retrieval cues may determine free recall of actions. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 399-415.
      • Stemler, L. K. (1997). Educational characteristics of multimedia: A literature review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 339-359.
      • Stern, E., Aprea, C. und Ebner, H. G. (2003). Improving cross-content transfer in text processing by means of active graphical representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 191-203.
      • Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
      • Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
      • Sternberg, R. J. (Hrsg.). (2003). The Psychologist's Companion: A Guide to Scientific Writing for Students and Researchers (4. Auflage). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
      • Stevens, J. P. (2001). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
      • Stiller, K. D., Freitag, A., Zinnbauer, P. und Freitag, C. (2009). How pacing of multimedia instructions can influence modality effects: A case of superiority of visual texts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 184-203.
      • Stoyanov, S. und Kirschner, P. (2004). Expert concept mapping method for defining the characteristics of adaptive E-Learning: ALFANET project case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 41-56.
      • Surber, J. R. und Schroeder, M. (2007). EVect of prior domain knowledge and headings on processing of informative text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 485-498.
      • Sweller, J. (1983). Control mechanisms in problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 11, 32-40.
      • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
      • Sweller, J. (1993). Some cognitive processes and their consequences for the organisation and presentation of information. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 1-8.
      • Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
      • Sweller, J. (2002, July). Visualisation and instructional design. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Dynamic Visualizations and Learning, Tübingen, Deutschland.
      • Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 9–31.
      • Sweller, J. (2005a). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 19-30). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Sweller, J. (2005b). The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 159-167). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Sweller, J. (2009). Cognitive bases of human creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 11-19.
      • Sweller, J. und Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185-233.
      • Sweller, J. und Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59-89.
      • Sweller, J. und Levine, M. (1982). Effects of goal specificity on means-ends analysis and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 8, 463-474.
      • Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. und Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.

      T

      • Tabachneck-Schijf, H. J. M. und Simon, H. A. (1998). Alternative representations of instructional material. In D. Peterson (Hrsg.), Forms of representation (S. 28-46). Exeter: Intellect Books.
      • Tabachneck, H. J. M., Koedinger, K. R. und Nathan, M. J. (1994). Towards a theoretical account of strategy use and sense making in mathematical problem solving. In A. Ram und K. Eiselt (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
      • Tapiero, I. (2001). The construction and updating of a spatial mental model from text and map: Effect of imagery and anchor. In J.-F. Rouet, J. Levonen und A. Biardeau (Hrsg.), Multimedia learning: Cognitive and instructional issues (S. 45-57). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
      • Tarmizi, R. und Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424-436.
      • Taylor, J., Sumner, T. und Law, A. (1997). Talking about multimedia: A layered design framework. Journal of Educational Media, 23, 215-241.
      • Thalheimer, W. (2004). Bells, whistles, neon, and purple prose: When interesting words, sounds, and visuals hurt learning and performance - a review of the seductive-augmentation research. [Internet/WWW]. Verfügbar unter: http://www.coedu.hu/domain9/files/modules/module15/28283C732CAE682.pdf [5. Juni 2009].
      • Thompson, N. und McGill, T. J. (2008). Multimedia and cognition: Examining the effect of applying cognitive principles to the design of instructional materials. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39, 143-159.
      • Thomson, C. P. und Barnett, C. (1981). Memory for product names: The generation effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 241-243.
      • Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P. und Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 257-287.
      • Tobin, S. und Grondin, S. (2009). Video games and the perception of very long durations by adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 554-559.
      • Towler, A. (2009). Effects of trainer expressiveness, seductive details, and trainee goal orientation on training outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20, 65-84.
      • Treichler, D. G. (1967). Are you missing the boat in training aid? Film and A-V Communication, 1, 14-16.
      • Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press.
      • Tulving, E. (1977). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving und W. Donaldson (Hrsg.), Organization of memory (S. 381-403). New York: Academic.
      • Tulving, E. und Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding, specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
      • Tuovinen, J. E. (2000). Optimising student cognitive load in computer education. In A. E. Ellis (Hrsg.), Fourth Australasian Computing Education Conference (Bd. 8, S. 235-241). Melbourne, Australia: Monash University.
      • Tuovinen, J. E. und Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 334-341.
      • Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B. und Bétrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: can it facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.

      V

      • Vadillo, M. A. und Matute, H. (2009). Learning in virtual environments: Some discrepancies between laboratory- and Internet-based research on associative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 402-406.
      • Valcke, M. (2002). Cognitive load: Updating the theory? Learning and Instruction, 12, 147–154.
      • van Bruggen, J. M., Kirschner, P. A. und Jochems, W. (2002). External representations of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12, 121-138.
      • van der Meij, J. (2007). Support for learning with multiple representations: Designing simulation-based learning environments. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
      • van der Meij, J. und de Jong, T. (2006). Supporting students' learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16, 199-212.
      • van Dijk, T. und Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
      • Van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F. und Tabbers, H. K. (2006). Cognitive aging and computer-based instructional design: Where do we go from here? Educational Psychology Review, 18, 141-157.
      • Van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F. G. W. C., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. und Schmidt, H. G. (2002). Cognitive load theory and aging: Effects of worked examples on training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12, 87-105.
      • Van Gog, T., Ericsson, K. A., Rikers, R. M. J. P. und Paas, F. (2005). Instructional design for advanced learners: Establishing connections between the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and deliberate practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 73-81.
      • Van Gog, T., Kester, L., Nievelstein, F., Giesbers, B. und Paas, F. (2009). Uncovering cognitive processes: Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 325-331.
      • Van Gog, T. und Paas, F. (2008). Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educational Psychologist, 43, 16-26.
      • Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P. und Sweller, J. (2009). The mirror neuron system and observational learning: Implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 21-30.
      • van Joolingen, W. R. und de Jong, M. T. (1991). Supporting hypothesis generation by learners exploring an interactive computer simulation. Instructional Science, 20, 389-404.
      • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1990). Strategies for programming instruction in high school: Program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 265-287.
      • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. und Ayres, P. (2005). Research on Cognitive Load Theory and its design implications for E-Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 5-13.
      • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. und De Croock, M. B. M. (1992). Strategies for computer-based programming instruction: Program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 365-394.
      • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. und Kester, L. (2005). The four-component instructional design model: Multimedia principles in environments for complex learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 71-93). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
      • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. und Krammer, H. P. M. (1987). Instructional strategies and tactics for the design of introductory computer programming courses in high school. Instructional Science, 16, 251-285.
      • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. und Krammer, H. P. M. (1990). The "completion strategy" in programming instruction: Theoretical and empirical support. In S. Dijkstra, B. H. M. van Hout-Wolters und P. C. van der Sijde (Hrsg.), Research on Instruction (S. 45-61). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
      • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Schuurman, J. G., De Croock, M. B. M. und Paas, F. (2002). Redirecting learners' attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12, 11-37.
      • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Schuurman, J. G., de Croock, M. B. M. und Paas, F. G. W. C. (2002). Redirecting learners' attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12, 11-37.
      • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. und Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2009). Toward a synthesis of cognitive load theory, four-component instructional design, and self-directed learning. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 55-66.
      • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. und Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive Load Theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147-177.
      • Van Rosmalen, P., Vogten, H., Van Es, R., Passier, H., Poelmans, P. und Koper, R. (2006). Authoring a full life cycle model in standards-based, adaptive e-learning. Educational Technology and Society, 9, 72-83.
      • VanLehn, K. (1988). Toward a theory of impasse-driven learning. In H. Mandl und A. Lesgold (Hrsg.), Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems (S. 19-41). New York: Springer.
      • VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A. und Rose, C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 31, 1-60.
      • Vaubel, K. P. und Gettys, C. F. (1990). Inferring user expertise for adaptive interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 95-117.
      • Veronikas, S. und Shaughnessy, M. F. (2005). An Interview with Richard Mayer. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 179-189.
      • Verwey, W. B. und Veltman, H. A. (1996). Detecting short periods of elevated workload: A comparison of nine workload assessment techniques. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 270-285.
      • Vollmeyer, R., Burns, B. und Holyoak, K. (1996). The impact of goal specificity on strategy use and the acquisition of problem structure. Cognitive Science, 20, 75-100.
      • von der Linden, N. (2008). Metakognitive Überwachungsprozesse im Entwicklungsverlauf. Hamburg: Kovac.
      • von der Lippe, P. und Kladroba, A. (2002). Repräsentativität. Marketing, 24, 227 -238.
      • Vygotski, L. S. (1963). Learning and mental development at school age. In B. Simon und J. Simon (Hrsg.), Educational psychology in the U.S.S.R. (S. 21-34). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

      W

      • Wainer, H. und Thissen, D. (1981). Graphical data analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 191-241.
      • Wardle, K. F. (1977). Textbook illustrations: Do they aid reading comprehension? Vortrag vorgestellt auf dem Annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
      • Washburne, J. N. (1927). An experimental study of various graphs, tabular and textual methods of presenting quantitative material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 18, 361-376 und 465-476.
      • Weber, R. (2001). Datenanalyse mittels Neuronaler Netze am Beispiel des Publikumserfolgs von Spielfilmen. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 13, 164-176.
      • Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., Habegger, S., Steiner, Y. und Groner, R. (2008). Playing online games against computer- vs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2274-2291.
      • Weidenmann, B. (1997). "Multimedia": Mehrere Medien, mehrere Codes, mehrere Sinneskanäle? Unterrichtswissenschaft, 25, 197-206.
      • Weidenmann, B. (2001). Lernen mit Medien. In A. Krapp und B. Weidenmann (Hrsg.), Pädagogische Psychologie (4. Auflage, S. 415-465). Weinheim: Beltz PVU.
      • Weidenmann, B. (2002). Multicodierung und Multimodalität im Lernprozeß. In L. J. Issing und P. Klimsa (Hrsg.), Information und Lernen mit Multimedia (3. Auflage, S. 45-62). Weinheim: Beltz PVU.
      • Weidenmann, B., Paechter, M. und Schweizer, K. (2004). Lehrbuch der Medienpsychologie. In R. Mangold, P. Vorderer und G. Bente (Hrsg.), E-Learning und netzbasierte Wissenskommunikation (S. 743-768). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
      • Weir, G. R. S. und Heeps, S. (2003). Getting the message across: Ten principles for web animation, Seventh IASTED International Conference on Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications (S. 121-126). Honolulu, HI; USA: ACTA Press.
      • Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems. CA, USA: Morgan Kaufman.
      • Whitley, B. E. J. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: a meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1-22.
      • Wierwille, W. W. und Eggemeier, F. L. (1993). Recommendations for mental workload measurement in a test and evaluation environment. Human Factors, 35, 263-281.
      • Wilder, J. (1931). Das "Ausgangswertgesetz", ein unbeachtetes biologisches Gesetz und seine Bedeutung für Forschung und Praxis. Zeitschrift für Neurologie, 137, 317-338.
      • Winberg, T. M. und Hedman, L. (2008). Student attitudes toward learning, level of pre-knowledge and instruction type in a computer-simulation: effects on flow experiences and perceived learning outcomes. Instructional Science, 36, 269-287.
      • Winn, W. (1982). The role of diagrammatic representation in learning sequences, identification and classification as a function of verbal and spatial ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 78-89.
      • Wirth, J., Künsting, J. und Leutner, D. (2009). The impact of goal specificity and goal type on learning outcome and cognitive load. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 299-305.
      • Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P., Raskin, E. und Karp, S. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
      • Wittmann, W. W., Süß, H. M. und Oberauer, K. (1996). Determinanten komplexen Problemlösens. [Internet/WWW]. Verfügbar unter: http://www.psychologie.uni-mannheim.de/psycho2/publi/ps/ber09.pdf [5. Juni 2009].
      • Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376.
      • Wittwer, J. und Renkl, A. (2008). Why instructional explanations often do not work: A framework for understanding the effectiveness of instructional explanations. Educational Psychologist, 43, 49-64.
      • Wong, A., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., Smith, L., Cooper, G. A., Paas, F.et al. (2009). Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 339-347.
      • Wouters, P., Tabbers, H. K. und Paas, F. (2007). Interactivity in video-based models. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 327-342.

      Y

      • Yellowlees, P. M. und Marks, S. (2007). Problematic Internet use or Internet addiction? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1447-1453.
      • Yildirim, Z., Ozden, M. Y. und Aksu, M. (2001). Comparison of hypermedia learning and traditional instruction on knowledge acquisition and retention. The Journal of Educational Research, 94, 207-214.
      • Yoon, S. W. und Johnson, S. D. (2008). Phases and patterns of group development in virtual learning teams. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 595-618.

      Z

      • Zacks, J. und Tversky, B. (1999). Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory and Cognition, 27, 1073-1079.
      • Zhang, J. und Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87-122.
      • Zhu, X. und Simon, H. (1987). Learning mathematics from examples and by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 137-166.
      • Zijlstra, F. R. H. und van Doorn, L. (1985). The construction of a scale to measure perceived effort. Delft, Holland: Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Delft University of Technology.

      Anregungen, Fragen und Fehler an: Mailadresse: 'GuenterDanielRey at web.de'

      • Impressum
      • Vorwort
      • Sachverzeichnis
      • Rezensionen
      • Literatur
      • Danksagung